0.06/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 1440 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 180 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 08:46:53 EDT 2024 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.18/0.45 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p 0.85/0.61 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.85/0.61 # partial match(1): HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN 0.85/0.61 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNSFN. 0.85/0.61 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.85/0.61 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.85/0.61 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 180s (1) cores 0.85/0.61 # Starting sh4l with 180s (1) cores 0.85/0.61 # Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 180s (1) cores 0.85/0.61 # post_as_ho5 with pid 17826 completed with status 8 0.85/0.61 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 17825 completed with status 0 0.85/0.61 # Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.85/0.61 # partial match(1): HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN 0.85/0.61 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNSFN. 0.85/0.61 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.85/0.61 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.85/0.61 # No SInE strategy applied 0.85/0.61 # Search class: HGHNF-FFMM11-SSFSMFNN 0.85/0.61 # partial match(3): HGHNF-FFMF11-SHSSMFNN 0.85/0.61 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.85/0.61 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 487s (1) cores 0.85/0.61 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 91s (1) cores 0.85/0.61 # Starting new_ho_9 with 82s (1) cores 0.85/0.61 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 82s (1) cores 0.85/0.61 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 82s (1) cores 0.85/0.61 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 17831 completed with status 0 0.85/0.61 # Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.85/0.61 # partial match(1): HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN 0.85/0.61 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNSFN. 0.85/0.61 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.85/0.61 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.85/0.61 # No SInE strategy applied 0.85/0.61 # Search class: HGHNF-FFMM11-SSFSMFNN 0.85/0.61 # partial match(3): HGHNF-FFMF11-SHSSMFNN 0.85/0.61 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.85/0.61 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 487s (1) cores 0.85/0.61 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 91s (1) cores 0.85/0.61 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.85/0.61 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.85/0.61 0.85/0.61 # Proof found! 0.85/0.61 # SZS status Theorem 0.85/0.61 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_sort1, type, reg: $tType). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_22, type, c: reg > reg > $o). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_23, type, dc: reg > reg > $o). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_24, type, p: reg > reg > $o). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_26, type, o: reg > reg > $o). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_28, type, ec: reg > reg > $o). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_29, type, pp: reg > reg > $o). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_30, type, tpp: reg > reg > $o). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_31, type, ntpp: reg > reg > $o). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_32, type, catalunya: reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_33, type, france: reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_34, type, spain: reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_35, type, paris: reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_36, type, esk1_1: reg > reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_37, type, esk2_1: reg > reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_38, type, esk3_0: reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_39, type, esk4_0: reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_40, type, esk5_1: reg > reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_41, type, esk6_1: reg > reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_42, type, esk7_1: reg > reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_43, type, esk8_1: reg > reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_44, type, esk9_0: reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_45, type, esk10_1: reg > reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(decl_46, type, esk11_1: reg > reg). 0.85/0.61 thf(o, axiom, ((o)=(^[X1:reg, X2:reg]:(?[X3:reg]:(((p @ X3 @ X1)&(p @ X3 @ X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', o)). 0.85/0.61 thf(p, axiom, ((p)=(^[X1:reg, X2:reg]:(![X3:reg]:(((c @ X3 @ X1)=>(c @ X3 @ X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', p)). 0.85/0.61 thf(ec, axiom, ((ec)=(^[X1:reg, X2:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ X2)&~((o @ X1 @ X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', ec)). 0.85/0.61 thf(pp, axiom, ((pp)=(^[X1:reg, X2:reg]:(((p @ X1 @ X2)&~((p @ X2 @ X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', pp)). 0.85/0.61 thf(ntpp, axiom, ((ntpp)=(^[X1:reg, X2:reg]:(((pp @ X1 @ X2)&~(?[X3:reg]:(((ec @ X3 @ X1)&(ec @ X3 @ X2)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', ntpp)). 0.85/0.61 thf(tpp, axiom, ((tpp)=(^[X1:reg, X2:reg]:(((pp @ X1 @ X2)&?[X3:reg]:(((ec @ X3 @ X1)&(ec @ X3 @ X2))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', tpp)). 0.85/0.61 thf(dc, axiom, ((dc)=(^[X1:reg, X2:reg]:(~((c @ X1 @ X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', dc)). 0.85/0.61 thf(ax3, axiom, (ntpp @ paris @ france), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', ax3)). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_symmetric, axiom, ![X1:reg, X2:reg]:(((c @ X2 @ X1)<=(c @ X1 @ X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', c_symmetric)). 0.85/0.61 thf(con, conjecture, ((dc @ catalunya @ paris)&(dc @ spain @ paris)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', con)). 0.85/0.61 thf(ax2, axiom, (ec @ spain @ france), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', ax2)). 0.85/0.61 thf(ax1, axiom, (tpp @ catalunya @ spain), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EWGF5rG1YI/E---3.1_17747.p', ax1)). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_12, plain, ((o)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(?[X3:reg]:(((![X9:reg]:(((c @ X9 @ X3)=>(c @ X9 @ Z0))))&(![X10:reg]:(((c @ X10 @ X3)=>(c @ X10 @ Z1))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[o])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_13, plain, ((p)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(![X3:reg]:(((c @ X3 @ Z0)=>(c @ X3 @ Z1)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_14, plain, ((ec)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((c @ Z0 @ Z1)&~((?[X16:reg]:(((![X17:reg]:(((c @ X17 @ X16)=>(c @ X17 @ Z0))))&(![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ X16)=>(c @ X18 @ Z1)))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ec])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_15, plain, ((o)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(?[X3:reg]:(((![X9:reg]:(((c @ X9 @ X3)=>(c @ X9 @ Z0))))&(![X10:reg]:(((c @ X10 @ X3)=>(c @ X10 @ Z1))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_16, plain, ((pp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((![X19:reg]:(((c @ X19 @ Z0)=>(c @ X19 @ Z1))))&~((![X20:reg]:(((c @ X20 @ Z1)=>(c @ X20 @ Z0))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pp])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_17, plain, ((ntpp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((((![X29:reg]:(((c @ X29 @ Z0)=>(c @ X29 @ Z1))))&~((![X30:reg]:(((c @ X30 @ Z1)=>(c @ X30 @ Z0)))))))&~(?[X3:reg]:(((((c @ X3 @ Z0)&~((?[X31:reg]:(((![X32:reg]:(((c @ X32 @ X31)=>(c @ X32 @ X3))))&(![X33:reg]:(((c @ X33 @ X31)=>(c @ X33 @ Z0))))))))))&(((c @ X3 @ Z1)&~((?[X34:reg]:(((![X35:reg]:(((c @ X35 @ X34)=>(c @ X35 @ X3))))&(![X36:reg]:(((c @ X36 @ X34)=>(c @ X36 @ Z1))))))))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ntpp])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_18, plain, ((ec)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((c @ Z0 @ Z1)&~((?[X16:reg]:(((![X17:reg]:(((c @ X17 @ X16)=>(c @ X17 @ Z0))))&(![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ X16)=>(c @ X18 @ Z1)))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_19, plain, ((pp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((![X19:reg]:(((c @ X19 @ Z0)=>(c @ X19 @ Z1))))&~((![X20:reg]:(((c @ X20 @ Z1)=>(c @ X20 @ Z0))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_13])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_20, plain, ((ntpp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((((![X29:reg]:(((c @ X29 @ Z0)=>(c @ X29 @ Z1))))&~((![X30:reg]:(((c @ X30 @ Z1)=>(c @ X30 @ Z0)))))))&~(?[X3:reg]:(((((c @ X3 @ Z0)&~((?[X31:reg]:(((![X32:reg]:(((c @ X32 @ X31)=>(c @ X32 @ X3))))&(![X33:reg]:(((c @ X33 @ X31)=>(c @ X33 @ Z0))))))))))&(((c @ X3 @ Z1)&~((?[X34:reg]:(((![X35:reg]:(((c @ X35 @ X34)=>(c @ X35 @ X3))))&(![X36:reg]:(((c @ X36 @ X34)=>(c @ X36 @ Z1))))))))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), c_0_19])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_21, plain, ((tpp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((((![X21:reg]:(((c @ X21 @ Z0)=>(c @ X21 @ Z1))))&~((![X22:reg]:(((c @ X22 @ Z1)=>(c @ X22 @ Z0)))))))&?[X3:reg]:(((((c @ X3 @ Z0)&~((?[X23:reg]:(((![X24:reg]:(((c @ X24 @ X23)=>(c @ X24 @ X3))))&(![X25:reg]:(((c @ X25 @ X23)=>(c @ X25 @ Z0))))))))))&(((c @ X3 @ Z1)&~((?[X26:reg]:(((![X27:reg]:(((c @ X27 @ X26)=>(c @ X27 @ X3))))&(![X28:reg]:(((c @ X28 @ X26)=>(c @ X28 @ Z1)))))))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[tpp])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_22, plain, ((dc)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(~((c @ Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dc])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_23, plain, ((![X49:reg]:(((c @ X49 @ paris)=>(c @ X49 @ france)))&~(![X50:reg]:(((c @ X50 @ france)=>(c @ X50 @ paris)))))&~(?[X51:reg]:((((c @ X51 @ paris)&~(?[X52:reg]:((![X53:reg]:(((c @ X53 @ X52)=>(c @ X53 @ X51)))&![X54:reg]:(((c @ X54 @ X52)=>(c @ X54 @ paris)))))))&((c @ X51 @ france)&~(?[X55:reg]:((![X56:reg]:(((c @ X56 @ X55)=>(c @ X56 @ X51)))&![X57:reg]:(((c @ X57 @ X55)=>(c @ X57 @ france))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax3, c_0_20])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_24, plain, ((tpp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((((![X21:reg]:(((c @ X21 @ Z0)=>(c @ X21 @ Z1))))&~((![X22:reg]:(((c @ X22 @ Z1)=>(c @ X22 @ Z0)))))))&?[X3:reg]:(((((c @ X3 @ Z0)&~((?[X23:reg]:(((![X24:reg]:(((c @ X24 @ X23)=>(c @ X24 @ X3))))&(![X25:reg]:(((c @ X25 @ X23)=>(c @ X25 @ Z0))))))))))&(((c @ X3 @ Z1)&~((?[X26:reg]:(((![X27:reg]:(((c @ X27 @ X26)=>(c @ X27 @ X3))))&(![X28:reg]:(((c @ X28 @ X26)=>(c @ X28 @ Z1)))))))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_18]), c_0_19])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X1:reg, X2:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ X2)=>(c @ X2 @ X1))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_symmetric])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ~((~(c @ catalunya @ paris)&~(c @ spain @ paris))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]), c_0_22])])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_27, plain, ![X73:reg, X75:reg, X77:reg, X78:reg, X80:reg, X81:reg]:((((~(c @ X73 @ paris)|(c @ X73 @ france))&((c @ esk9_0 @ france)&~(c @ esk9_0 @ paris)))&(((~(c @ X80 @ (esk11_1 @ X75))|(c @ X80 @ X75)|~(c @ X75 @ france)|(~(c @ X77 @ (esk10_1 @ X75))|(c @ X77 @ X75)|~(c @ X75 @ paris)))&(~(c @ X81 @ (esk11_1 @ X75))|(c @ X81 @ france)|~(c @ X75 @ france)|(~(c @ X77 @ (esk10_1 @ X75))|(c @ X77 @ X75)|~(c @ X75 @ paris))))&((~(c @ X80 @ (esk11_1 @ X75))|(c @ X80 @ X75)|~(c @ X75 @ france)|(~(c @ X78 @ (esk10_1 @ X75))|(c @ X78 @ paris)|~(c @ X75 @ paris)))&(~(c @ X81 @ (esk11_1 @ X75))|(c @ X81 @ france)|~(c @ X75 @ france)|(~(c @ X78 @ (esk10_1 @ X75))|(c @ X78 @ paris)|~(c @ X75 @ paris))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])])])])])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_28, plain, ((c @ spain @ france)&~(?[X37:reg]:((![X38:reg]:(((c @ X38 @ X37)=>(c @ X38 @ spain)))&![X39:reg]:(((c @ X39 @ X37)=>(c @ X39 @ france))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax2, c_0_18])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_29, plain, ((![X40:reg]:(((c @ X40 @ catalunya)=>(c @ X40 @ spain)))&~(![X41:reg]:(((c @ X41 @ spain)=>(c @ X41 @ catalunya)))))&?[X42:reg]:((((c @ X42 @ catalunya)&~(?[X43:reg]:((![X44:reg]:(((c @ X44 @ X43)=>(c @ X44 @ X42)))&![X45:reg]:(((c @ X45 @ X43)=>(c @ X45 @ catalunya)))))))&((c @ X42 @ spain)&~(?[X46:reg]:((![X47:reg]:(((c @ X47 @ X46)=>(c @ X47 @ X42)))&![X48:reg]:(((c @ X48 @ X46)=>(c @ X48 @ spain)))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax1, c_0_24])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_30, plain, ![X58:reg, X59:reg]:((~(c @ X58 @ X59)|(c @ X59 @ X58))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])])])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ((c @ catalunya @ paris)|(c @ spain @ paris)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_32, plain, ![X1:reg, X3:reg, X2:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ france)|(c @ X3 @ paris)|~((c @ X1 @ (esk11_1 @ X2)))|~((c @ X2 @ france))|~((c @ X3 @ (esk10_1 @ X2)))|~((c @ X2 @ paris)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_33, plain, ![X1:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ france)|~((c @ X1 @ paris)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_34, plain, ![X61:reg]:(((c @ spain @ france)&((((c @ (esk2_1 @ X61) @ X61)|(c @ (esk1_1 @ X61) @ X61))&(~(c @ (esk2_1 @ X61) @ france)|(c @ (esk1_1 @ X61) @ X61)))&(((c @ (esk2_1 @ X61) @ X61)|~(c @ (esk1_1 @ X61) @ spain))&(~(c @ (esk2_1 @ X61) @ france)|~(c @ (esk1_1 @ X61) @ spain)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])])])])])])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_35, plain, ![X64:reg, X67:reg, X70:reg]:((((~(c @ X64 @ catalunya)|(c @ X64 @ spain))&((c @ esk3_0 @ spain)&~(c @ esk3_0 @ catalunya)))&(((c @ esk4_0 @ catalunya)&((((c @ (esk6_1 @ X67) @ X67)|(c @ (esk5_1 @ X67) @ X67))&(~(c @ (esk6_1 @ X67) @ catalunya)|(c @ (esk5_1 @ X67) @ X67)))&(((c @ (esk6_1 @ X67) @ X67)|~(c @ (esk5_1 @ X67) @ esk4_0))&(~(c @ (esk6_1 @ X67) @ catalunya)|~(c @ (esk5_1 @ X67) @ esk4_0)))))&((c @ esk4_0 @ spain)&((((c @ (esk8_1 @ X70) @ X70)|(c @ (esk7_1 @ X70) @ X70))&(~(c @ (esk8_1 @ X70) @ spain)|(c @ (esk7_1 @ X70) @ X70)))&(((c @ (esk8_1 @ X70) @ X70)|~(c @ (esk7_1 @ X70) @ esk4_0))&(~(c @ (esk8_1 @ X70) @ spain)|~(c @ (esk7_1 @ X70) @ esk4_0)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])])])])])])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_36, plain, ![X1:reg, X2:reg]:(((c @ X2 @ X1)|~((c @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ((c @ catalunya @ paris)|(c @ spain @ paris)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_38, plain, ![X1:reg, X2:reg, X3:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ france)|(c @ X2 @ paris)|~((c @ X2 @ (esk10_1 @ X3)))|~((c @ X1 @ (esk11_1 @ X3)))|~((c @ X3 @ paris)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_33])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_39, plain, ![X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk2_1 @ X1) @ X1)|(c @ (esk1_1 @ X1) @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_40, plain, ![X1:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ spain)|~((c @ X1 @ catalunya)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ((c @ spain @ paris)|(c @ paris @ catalunya)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36, c_0_37])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_42, plain, ![X1:reg, X3:reg, X2:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ X2)|(c @ X3 @ paris)|~((c @ X1 @ (esk11_1 @ X2)))|~((c @ X2 @ france))|~((c @ X3 @ (esk10_1 @ X2)))|~((c @ X2 @ paris)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_43, plain, ![X2:reg, X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ (esk10_1 @ X1))|(c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ paris)|(c @ X2 @ france)|~((c @ X2 @ (esk11_1 @ X1)))|~((c @ X1 @ paris)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_39])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_44, plain, ![X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk1_1 @ X1) @ X1)|~((c @ (esk2_1 @ X1) @ france)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, (c @ paris @ spain), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40, c_0_41]), c_0_36])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_46, plain, ![X1:reg, X2:reg, X3:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ paris)|(c @ X2 @ X3)|~((c @ X1 @ (esk10_1 @ X3)))|~((c @ X2 @ (esk11_1 @ X3)))|~((c @ X3 @ paris)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_42, c_0_33])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_47, plain, ![X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk11_1 @ X1)) @ (esk11_1 @ X1))|(c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ (esk10_1 @ X1))|(c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ paris)|~((c @ X1 @ paris)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43, c_0_39]), c_0_44])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, (c @ spain @ paris), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36, c_0_45])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_49, plain, ![X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk2_1 @ X1) @ X1)|~((c @ (esk1_1 @ X1) @ spain)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_50, plain, ![X1:reg]:((~((c @ (esk2_1 @ X1) @ france))|~((c @ (esk1_1 @ X1) @ spain)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_51, plain, ![X2:reg, X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ (esk10_1 @ X1))|(c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ paris)|(c @ X2 @ X1)|~((c @ X2 @ (esk11_1 @ X1)))|~((c @ X1 @ paris)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46, c_0_39])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_52, negated_conjecture, ((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ (esk10_1 @ spain))|(c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk11_1 @ spain)) @ (esk11_1 @ spain))|(c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ paris)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47, c_0_48])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_53, plain, ![X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ (esk10_1 @ X1))|(c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ paris)|~((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk11_1 @ X1)) @ spain))|~((c @ X1 @ paris)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43, c_0_49]), c_0_50])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_54, negated_conjecture, ((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ (esk10_1 @ spain))|(c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk11_1 @ spain)) @ spain)|(c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ paris)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51, c_0_52]), c_0_48])])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_55, plain, ![X1:reg, X3:reg, X2:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ france)|(c @ X3 @ X2)|~((c @ X1 @ (esk11_1 @ X2)))|~((c @ X2 @ france))|~((c @ X3 @ (esk10_1 @ X2)))|~((c @ X2 @ paris)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_56, negated_conjecture, ((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ (esk10_1 @ spain))|(c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ paris)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53, c_0_54]), c_0_48])])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_57, plain, ![X1:reg, X3:reg, X2:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ X2)|(c @ X3 @ X2)|~((c @ X1 @ (esk11_1 @ X2)))|~((c @ X2 @ france))|~((c @ X3 @ (esk10_1 @ X2)))|~((c @ X2 @ paris)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_58, plain, ![X1:reg, X2:reg, X3:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ france)|(c @ X2 @ X3)|~((c @ X2 @ (esk10_1 @ X3)))|~((c @ X1 @ (esk11_1 @ X3)))|~((c @ X3 @ paris)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_55, c_0_33])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_59, negated_conjecture, (c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ (esk10_1 @ spain)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_56]), c_0_44])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_60, plain, ![X1:reg, X3:reg, X2:reg]:(((c @ X1 @ X2)|(c @ X3 @ X2)|~((c @ X3 @ (esk10_1 @ X2)))|~((c @ X1 @ (esk11_1 @ X2)))|~((c @ X2 @ paris)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_57, c_0_33])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_61, negated_conjecture, ![X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ spain)|(c @ X1 @ france)|~((c @ X1 @ (esk11_1 @ spain))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58, c_0_59]), c_0_48])])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_62, negated_conjecture, ![X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ spain)|(c @ X1 @ spain)|~((c @ X1 @ (esk11_1 @ spain))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60, c_0_59]), c_0_48])])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_63, negated_conjecture, ((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk11_1 @ spain)) @ (esk11_1 @ spain))|(c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ spain)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61, c_0_39]), c_0_44])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_64, negated_conjecture, ((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ spain)|~((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk11_1 @ spain)) @ spain))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61, c_0_49]), c_0_50])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_65, plain, ![X2:reg, X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ paris)|(c @ X2 @ france)|~((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ spain))|~((c @ X2 @ (esk11_1 @ X1)))|~((c @ X1 @ paris)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_49])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_66, negated_conjecture, (c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ spain), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62, c_0_63]), c_0_64])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_67, plain, ![X2:reg, X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ paris)|(c @ X2 @ X1)|~((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk10_1 @ X1)) @ spain))|~((c @ X2 @ (esk11_1 @ X1)))|~((c @ X1 @ paris)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46, c_0_49])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_68, negated_conjecture, ![X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ paris)|(c @ X1 @ france)|~((c @ X1 @ (esk11_1 @ spain))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65, c_0_66]), c_0_48])])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_69, negated_conjecture, ![X1:reg]:(((c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ paris)|(c @ X1 @ spain)|~((c @ X1 @ (esk11_1 @ spain))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67, c_0_66]), c_0_48])])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_70, negated_conjecture, ((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk11_1 @ spain)) @ (esk11_1 @ spain))|(c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ paris)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68, c_0_39]), c_0_44])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_71, negated_conjecture, ((c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ paris)|~((c @ (esk1_1 @ (esk11_1 @ spain)) @ spain))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68, c_0_49]), c_0_50])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_72, negated_conjecture, (c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ paris), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69, c_0_70]), c_0_71])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_73, negated_conjecture, (c @ (esk2_1 @ (esk10_1 @ spain)) @ france), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_72])). 0.85/0.61 thf(c_0_74, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50, c_0_73]), c_0_66])]), ['proof']). 0.85/0.61 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.85/0.61 # Parsed axioms : 30 0.85/0.61 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.85/0.61 # Initial clauses : 43 0.85/0.61 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 15 0.85/0.61 # Initial clauses in saturation : 28 0.85/0.61 # Processed clauses : 982 0.85/0.61 # ...of these trivial : 9 0.85/0.61 # ...subsumed : 309 0.85/0.61 # ...remaining for further processing : 664 0.85/0.61 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.85/0.61 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.85/0.61 # Backward-subsumed : 66 0.85/0.61 # Backward-rewritten : 97 0.85/0.61 # Generated clauses : 4970 0.85/0.61 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3045 0.85/0.61 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.85/0.61 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 62 0.85/0.61 # Paramodulations : 4970 0.85/0.61 # Factorizations : 0 0.85/0.61 # NegExts : 0 0.85/0.61 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.85/0.61 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.85/0.61 # Total rewrite steps : 3822 0.85/0.61 # ...of those cached : 3780 0.85/0.61 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.85/0.61 # Propositional check models : 0 0.85/0.61 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.85/0.61 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.85/0.61 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.85/0.61 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.85/0.61 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.85/0.61 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.85/0.61 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.85/0.61 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.85/0.61 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.85/0.61 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.85/0.61 # Current number of processed clauses : 473 0.85/0.61 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 50 0.85/0.61 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.85/0.61 # Negative unit clauses : 7 0.85/0.61 # Non-unit-clauses : 416 0.85/0.61 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2043 0.85/0.61 # ...number of literals in the above : 9480 0.85/0.61 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.85/0.61 # Current number of archived clauses : 191 0.85/0.61 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 39125 0.85/0.61 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15061 0.85/0.61 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 426 0.85/0.61 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 536 0.85/0.61 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.85/0.61 # BW rewrite match attempts : 22 0.85/0.61 # BW rewrite match successes : 7 0.85/0.61 # Condensation attempts : 982 0.85/0.61 # Condensation successes : 0 0.85/0.61 # Termbank termtop insertions : 121067 0.85/0.61 # Search garbage collected termcells : 786 0.85/0.61 0.85/0.61 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.85/0.61 # User time : 0.141 s 0.85/0.61 # System time : 0.001 s 0.85/0.61 # Total time : 0.142 s 0.85/0.61 # Maximum resident set size: 1976 pages 0.85/0.61 0.85/0.61 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.85/0.61 # User time : 0.696 s 0.85/0.61 # System time : 0.031 s 0.85/0.61 # Total time : 0.727 s 0.85/0.61 # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages 0.85/0.61 % E---3.1 exiting 0.85/0.61 % E exiting 0.85/0.61 EOF